featured

No to War in Ukraine demonstration report

Across the world people are uniting for peace and calling for an end to war in Ukraine. On Sunday 6th March, 2022, London CND joined the No to War in Ukraine Global Day of Action.

Stop the War and CND organised the London demonstration, and thousands showed up to say:

No to war in Ukraine.

Russian Troops Out.

No to NATO Expansion.

We opposed the Russian invasion of Ukraine. We called for an immediate ceasefire and the withdrawal of all Russian troops. We also recognised this is a conflict thirty years in the making, a conflict in which Britain is playing a provocative role - talking up war, decrying diplomacy and increased military deployments to neighbouring countries.

At the final rally, London CND vice-chair Bruce Kent delivered a powerful speech:

"We are wasting billions on nuclear weapons which could be used for hospitals, education...We are just showing off!"

Further actions on the subjects are to be expected.

London CND joins the Peace in Ukraine Coalition

London Region CND's name has joined the Peace in Ukraine Coalition and supports the global day of action on Sunday 6th March under the slogans:

Stop the War in Ukraine.

Russian Troops Out.

No to NATO expansion.

As well as CND, the coalition includes: No to NATO Coalition, Pax Christi USA, CODEPINK, Peace Action USA, Stop the War Coalition, United for Peace and Justice, Veterans For Peace, and many more national, regional, and local organisations. You can see the list here and take a look at the Coalition's website.

CND Statement on Ukraine

No Nuclear War

De-escalate the crisis in Ukraine

 Join CND in calling for an end to conflict in Ukraine to avert the threat of nuclear war:


“As the crisis in Ukraine escalates, the risk of nuclear war comes ever closer. President Biden pointed out last week that war between the US and Russia would be World War III, yet this possibility is closer than ever before. The entry of Russian forces into Ukraine makes diplomacy more urgent, not less.  Yet British political leaders continue to denigrate diplomatic initiatives, even as the conflict intensifies.

 

“Rather than refusing to talk with the Russian leadership, the US administration must get to the negotiating table, to address all the fundamental issues in this conflict, including how to make the Minsk agreements work. Rather than further escalating the  conflict and militarisation of the region, the US must  recognise the risk of nuclear war and do everything possible to  achieve a peaceful solution.

 

“The Ukrainian Pacifist Movement:  ‘…condemns all military actions on the sides of Russia and Ukraine in the context of current conflict. We call the leadership of both states and military forces to step back and sit at the negotiation table. Peace in Ukraine and around the world can be achieved only in a nonviolent way. War is a crime against humanity. Therefore, we are determined not to support any kind of war and to strive for the removal of all causes of war.’

 

“Russia and the United States together have almost 12,000 nuclear weapons—some of which are 3,000 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb. Add to that the arsenals of NATO members France and the United Kingdom, not to mention around 150 nuclear bombs that the US sites in western Europe under the auspices of NATO.”

 


Take action –

Join CND’s international rally, Saturday 26 February, No War in Ukraine, No to Nato

Get a free No Nuclear War poster here

Print you own window poster here

Carry on reading Kate Hudson’s blog here

Read Labour CND’s statement on Nato here

 


 

[Article] - Kate Hudson on Ukraine

No nuclear war

Kate Hudson, CND General Secretary
- first published on the CND website -


As the crisis in Ukraine escalates, the risk of nuclear war comes ever closer. President Biden pointed out last week that war between the US and Russia would be World War III, yet no serious progress has yet been made to deal with the underlying issues through negotiation. British political leaders remain determined to denigrate diplomatic initiatives, even as the possibility of war sigbnificantly increases.

The rational response to the latest dangerous developments would be to recognise that posturing has failed and now it’s time to step back and get to the negotiating table, to make the Minsk agreements work. The regional autonomy promised to those parts of eastern Ukraine with significant ethnic Russian populations must be implemented. That is how to resolve the issue of eastern Ukraine, to get the Russian troops out, and achieve a lasting settlement in the interests of all of its peoples. But that has not yet happened. Rather than further escalating the rhetoric and militarisation of the region, the US must treat this as a wake-up call to achieve a peaceful solution.

Russia and the United States together have almost 12,000 nuclear weapons—some of which are 3,000 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb. Add to that the arsenals of NATO members France and the United Kingdom, not to mention around 150 nuclear bombs that the US sites in western Europe under the auspices of NATO. Far from their significance receding since the Cold War, all nuclear arsenals are being modernised and upgraded—and in the case of the UK’s, being increased, as announced by the Johnson government last year.

During the Cold War, the notion of ‘mutually assured destruction’ meant that—in theory at least—leaders understood that a nuclear war was unwinnable and must never be fought. Indeed the leaders of nuclear weapons states recently reiterated that point, first made by Reagan and Gorbachev in 1985. But their actions belie those words and things have changed for the worse. During his term of office, Donald Trump produced and deployed ‘usable’ nuclear weapons; in the UK’s Integrated Review last year, new scenarios were outlined in which Britain would use nuclear weapons.

Do our political leaders actually understand what the use of just a single nuclear weapon would mean? The catastrophic human and environmental destruction, the incineration of cities and populations, and the appalling deaths from radiation poisoning? A nuclear exchange would be catastrophic, and nuclear war between the US and Russia would present an existential threat. Johnson and Starmer need to reflect on this when they are ramping up their bellicose rhetoric.

While they posture, the people of Ukraine are suffering; the country is paying a heavy economic and human price as a result of these hostilities.

So what of NATO’s role in this? NATO is neither a force for peace and democracy, nor an innocent bystander.

Despite dramatic changes across Europe after 1989, with the demise of the Soviet Union and the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, NATO—under US leadership—began the process of expansion into eastern Europe. This has continued to include former Soviet republics, and NATO has gone on to become a global military force, abandoning its ‘defensive’ remit and engaging in war far beyond the North Atlantic.

NATO expansion has caused significant regional tension and its continued expansionary plans are threatening to drag Europe into a devastating war—because it refuses to take Russian security concerns into account. Russia already has a direct land border with NATO states Estonia and Latvia. If Ukraine joins NATO, then Russia will have over a thousand miles of additional land border with an openly hostile, nuclear-armed military alliance with a nuclear ‘first use’ policy. It is hard to imagine that a British government would happily accept such a situation in reverse.

There is no possibility whatsoever that war will resolve these complex problems, and it might just end with the destruction of humanity. Only dialogue and a willingness to be open to the concerns of others will make a difference. Many in Europe speak of a new security framework for Europe, with a commitment to common security rather than endlessly increasing militarisation, more nuclear weapons, and ultimately more deaths. This is the path that our own government must now pursue, rather than stoking up endless conflict.

[Video] Jenny Jones on #KillTheBill

The government is planning to make important changes to the law that will restrict the right to protest when lockdown restrictions ease.

The police, crime, sentencing and courts bill would give the Home Secretary, Priti Patel, powers to create laws to define ‘serious disruption’ to communities and organisations, on which police can then rely to impose conditions on protests.

But in a victory for protestors, the House of Lords - in which Baroness Jenny Jones sits - voted down some of the worst elements of the bill.

Jenny gave us background on the Kill the Bill campaigns, her experience in the House of Lords and her views on future developments as the bill returns to the House of Commons.

FUKUSHIMA: ANOTHER PROBLEM - David Polden

FUKUSHIMA: ANOTHER PROBLEM!

- David Polden -

First published in Kick Nuclear January newsletter


At Kick Nuclear’s Friday vigils outside the Japanese Embassy (for details see front page) we have begun handing out a new Fukushima Nuclear Disaster 2022 Update that I’ve written (copies sent at request)

In this update I talked about the continuance of the disaster, including the problem of dealing with well over a million tonnes of radioactive water already, and continually rising, being stored in tanks as a result of the need to keep the reactors’ melted-down fuel cool by pouring water down through the ractors.  Japan’s current plan is to dump all this water in the Pacific, after it has been subject to a treatment process that removes a lot of the radioactivity, but not all (It doesn’t remove the tritium or all of other radio nucleides), thus polluting the Pacific.

What I completely overlooked however was the problem of what to do with the of course this doesn’t result in a diminution of the radioactivity involved, it just means it gets highly concentrated in a much smaller volume.  The resulting mixture is characterized as “slurry”.

“But where to put it?” an article dated 10/1/22 by Robert Hunziker in Counterpunch asks.

He continues, “How to handle and dispose of the radioactive slurry…is almost, and in fact may be, an impossible quagmire.  It’s a big one as the storage containers for the tainted slurry quickly degrade because of the high concentration of radioactive slurry.  These storage containers…in turn, have to be constantly replaced as the radioactivity slurry eats away at the containers’ liners.

“Radioactive slurry is muddy and resembles a shampoo in appearance, and it contains highly radioactive strontium readings that reach tens of millions of Becquerel’s per cubic centimeter.  Whereas, according to the [US Environmental Protection Agency], 148 Becquerel’s per cubic metre…is the safe level for human exposure.  Thus, tens of millions per cubic centimetre is “off the charts” dangerous!  Instant death…

“Since March 2013, TEPCO has accumulated 3,373 special vessels that hold these highly toxic radioactive slurry concentrations.  But, because the integrity of the vessels deteriorates so quickly, the durability of the containers reaches a limit, meaning the vessels will need replacement by mid-2025.

“Making matters ever worse…the NRA [US Nuclear Regulatory Authority] has actually accused TEPCO [the Tokyo Electric Power Company] of “underestimating the impact issue of the radioactivity on the containers linings,” claiming TEPCO improperly measured the slurry density when conducting dose evaluations.  Whereas, the density level is always highest at the bottom, not the top where TEPCO did the evaluations, thus failing to measure and report the most radioactive of the slurry.  Not a small error.

“As of June 2021, NRA’s own assessment of the containers concluded …31 radioactive super hot containers had…reached the end of operating life…another 56 would need replacement within the next 2 years.

“Transferring slurry is a time-consuming highly dangerous horrific job, which exposes yet a second issue of unacceptable risks of radioactive substances released into the air during transfer of slurry.  TEPCO expects to open and close the transfers remotely.  But, TEPCO, as of January 2, 2022, has not yet revealed acceptable plans for dealing with the necessary transfer of slurry from weakening, almost deteriorated containers, into fresh, new containers.  (Source: TEPCO Slow to Respond to Growing Crisis at Fukushima Plant, The Asahi Shimbun, [2/1/22]

“Meanwhile, additional batches of a massive succession of containers that must be transferred to new containers will be reaching the end of shelf life, shortly.

“Another nightmarish problem has surfaced for TEPCO…In the aftermath of the 2011 blowup, TEPCO stored radioactive water in underground spaces below two buildings near reactor No.4. Bags of a mineral known as zeolite were placed to absorb cesium. Twenty-six tons (52,000 lbs.) of bags are still immersed with radiation readings of 4 Sieverts per hour, enough to kill half of all workers in the immediate vicinity within one hour. The bags need to be removed.

“TEPCO intends to robotically start removing the highly radioactive bags, starting in 2023, but does not know where the bags should be stored. Where do you store radioactive bags containing enough radioactive power to kill someone within one hour of exposure?...”

The Integrated Review explained - INFOGRAPHIC

Wondering what the Integrated Review is? Check out this infographic…

You can click on the pictures to expand.