BDS Campaign Taking off in London

This article was written by London CND Vice Chair Christine Shawcroft.

At a full Council meeting on 22nd January, Tower Hamlets Council voted for a complete audit of its pension fund investments and declared its intention to divest funding from arms companies in particular. This was the culmination of many months’ hard work by members of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign and CND, leafletting and petitioning for divestment. Many thousands of signatures had been gathered on the streets for the petition, which was also placed on the Council’s website.

“I am pleased that the current Council has agreed to divest from companies assisting in Israel’s genocidal policies. This decision can only be activated if still more other London Boroughs do the same as pension funds are invested jointly, but this is a significant step forward" says Phil Sedler of Tower Hamlets CND.

The BDS campaigning is getting results across London, with Tower Hamlets being the fourth council to commit to divestment. Local campaigns in other boroughs are still very active. The impetus for BDS is, of course, the war crimes and plausible genocide taking place in Palestine, despite a recent negotiated ceasefire. There have been numerous breaches of the ceasefire by the Israeli government, and a stepping up of military action in the illegally occupied West Bank. It is being said locally that ‘ceasefire’ means ‘you cease, and we fire’ to the government. It has also been reported that Trump ‘sold’ the ceasefire agreement to the government by assuring them that they could break it and suffer no sanctions from the US.

However, the recent divestment decision taken in East London came just a few days after Bristol City Council voted to call on Avon Pension Fund to divest from companies supplying weapons or weapons components to Israel, as well as companies doing business in the illegal settlements. Other local authorities have already voted for divestment, with more resolutions to councils in the pipeline.

The horrors unfolding in Gaza are concentrating activists’ minds on stopping the complicity of our government and British firms with the actions of the right-wing Israeli government and calling for international law to be obeyed. However, stopping investment in arms companies would also affect other conflict zones around the world, and would be a major step towards peace in many areas. Many companies involved in the production of ‘conventional’ weapons are also involved in the production of nuclear weapons or of components for them. BDS campaigns can therefore also be part of our campaigning for a nuclear-free world.

Watch the London CND Conference 2025 on Youtube

London CND Conference 2025: Trump in the White House, Nato, war, nukes... what should we expect? Is now available to watch on YouTube.

Our 2025 conference featured speakers, including Jeremy Corbyn, MP; Vijay Prashad from the Tricontinental Institute; CND General Secretary Sophie Bolt; China Specialist Keith Bennet; former student leader and now a member of the Labour Party NEC Jess Barnard; and Jenny Jones of the Green Party.

Watch the conference by clicking the link below.

The full programme can be found here

Nato, War, Nukes: What Should we Expect from Trump? London Conference 2025

“Originally published by Labour Outlook; republished with permission: NATO, War & Nukes – What Should We Expect from Trump?

Months of speculation about changes to US foreign policy will be brought to an end when Trump is inaugurated as US President on 20 January. In the first of a two-part series about US foreign policy, Carol Turner reflects on what we should, and should not, expect from President Trump’s second term. 

A joint meeting of the US Congress on Monday certified the results of the presidential election results, formally declaring Donald Trump the winner and reminding us that his inauguration is only a fortnight away. Months of speculation about likely changes to the US foreign policy will be clarified as Trump rolls out his policies in the weeks and months that follow.

  • What will a Make America Great Again White House mean for Nato and nuclear strategy?

  • To what extent are relations with what China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea likely to change?

  • Will Israel be free to continue its slaughter in the Occupied Territories?

  • Will Trump encourage Netanyahu to pursue his military rampage across the Middle East?

  • Can the Trump really end the war in Ukraine?

The veil will be lifted on some of these and other strategic issues once Trump is in the Oval Office. Meanwhile, he has already begun announcing his views on a range of foreign policy issues – from the Panama Canal to Greenland. The most recent, and perhaps most concerning of these is his call for a military spending hike by Nato member states to 5% of national GDP. More than anything else, this strongly suggests a continuation of the drive to war.

Media speculation about who’s in, who’s out, and who’s a contender for influence in Trump’s administration began even before the election result was announced last October, and what individual appointments would likely mean for White House policy. By the end of December, as Trump revealed the names of his nominees for the top jobs, media speculation reached a near-frenzy.

The transfer of power from one president to another is an extensive, three-month process in the United States. Many of the government posts occupied by civil servants in Britain are political appointments in the US. US presidents make around 4,000 of these, and more than a quarter require Senate approval.

Confirming Trump’s picks for office is made easier by Republican control of the House and Senate as well as the White House. But Senate approval is more than a shoo-in. There’s been one hi-viz withdrawal already. Matt Gaetz stood down as Attorney General nominee when it was made clear he lacked sufficient support.

As preparations for the hearings began, Senate Majority Leader John Thune pointed out it was still unclear if all Trump’s appointments would be accepted. Many of the challenges are to military and intelligence appointments. The Defence Secretary is one of the most important, but nominee Pete Hegseth might not make it. The confirmation of Kash Patel as FBI Director and Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence is also said to be uncertain.

Trump’s choice for his top team, is no guarantee of what the foreign policy agenda of the White House will be, What we do know for certain are the actions Trump took in his first presidential term. I will be outling some of them in a follow-up Labour Outlook article. Regardless of shifts in particular policies, Trump’s actions in 2017-21 show little room to think he’ll break the US trajectory to war.

London Region Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament is doing our bit to magnify CND’s message. The world is moving closer to nuclear war! Take action before it’s too late! Our 2025 annual conference, ‘Trump in the White House – Nato, war, nukes…. what should we expect?’, takes place online this Sunday. We will be looking at the likely impact of the second Trump presidency with a programme that includes:

  • Jeremy Corbyn, reflecting on prospects for peace and justice,

  • Sophie Bolt, laying out the real situation with nuclear weapons in Britain, and

  • Vijay Prashad considering the impact of Trump’s presidency

We’ve also got:

  • Jess Barnard on Israel’s war on Palestine

  • Carol Turner on Nato and Ukraine and

  • Keith Bennett on Asia-Pacific developments

  • Peter Burt and Dave Webb, explaining how the Ukraine and Middle East are a testing ground for new tech weapons and a showcase for the arms industry

  • Jenny Jones, Tony Staunton, and Angie Zelter discussing peace movement priorities

The fightback is now. Our job is to lift the veil on the real meaning of Trump’s presidency.

Register today